I. I'll explain what subliminal messaging is
a. Explain how it is too fast for the conscious mind to notice
b. Explain how it affects the subconscious mind
c. Describe the controversy over subliminal messaging
*interview answer to question 1 which gauges the expert's opinion on the ethics of subliminal messaging*
II. Explain why people don't believe it affects behavior
a. Present argument that if you can't understand it, your subconscious mind can't understand it either
b. Briefly discuss how the idea of subliminal messaging came about with the James Vicary hoax experiment
*explanatory picture to go along with what is discussed here*
III. Explain why people believe it does affect behavior
a. Reiterate that it affects the subconscious mind and go into how the subconscious mind affects behavior
b. Present and explain 2 case studies
*interview answer to question 2 which gauges the expert's opinion on a case study and whether or not they believe subliminal messaging is effective*
IV. Conclusion
a. Talk about how it may not have complete control over us but will have an effect on you if you're already motivated to pursue a goal
b. Briefly reiterate the expert's points
I like the way Brandon outlined his topic by showing where he intends to put his interview questions at and picture(s). For his second point I think he meant to write "explain why people don't believe it affects behavior" instead of "why people don't people..." Instead of presenting both the case studies in the same discussion point maybe separate the two and/or present them under a different major point on the topic. He has a great outline for what he is going to do with subliminal messaging by presenting the background information first, then diving into both sides of the argument with case studies and interview video, and finally concluding it all. Lastly, like the topic choice as it is something people would not normally think/talk about and might want to learn more about.
ReplyDeleteBrandon has chosen a great way to organize the information he plans to present in his final E-portfolio post. Starting with background information gives the reader and understanding of the topic before continuing on to discussions of controversy. Presenting case studies for one side of the argument while not presenting any for the opposite side may cause the two sides to be unbalanced, as the case studies will provide convincing evidence. Perhaps find a case study that supports arguments against subliminal messaging as well, if there are any. Overall though, it seems as if Brandon has thought through both sides and has a good strategy for balancing them. Adding an example of subliminal messaging somewhere in the post may also enhance the overall content.
ReplyDeleteThis topic is extremely interesting and due to its controversial nature there should be no shortage of information on the topic. Your outline is really excellent. It is specific enough that when you are writing your final e-portfolio post you are going to have a huge head start, while vague enough that it does not blur the lines between an outline and a first draft in outline form. Also, it is really smart to have also planned where your media will go in advance. That way you don't accidentally stick it at the bottom for the lack of a better idea. Some aspects to reconsider or improve upon are for one, the beginning. However attractive it may seem, starting your e-portfolio or any paper with a definition is poor writing. Starting with some piece of controversial information would grab the reader more than a definition of subliminal messaging. Other than that I am really impressed with your outline and I think it makes for a really great e-portfolio.
ReplyDeleteYou may want to add a part about the popular image of subliminal messaging, how it is perceived. A good source on that is: http://www.debate.org/debates/Subliminal-messages-pose-no-danger-to-society-even-when-used./1/
Great job!